Skip to Main Content

Sixth Circuit Decides McDonnell Douglas Applies to FMLA Interference Claims

Donald v. Sybra, Inc., No. 10-2153, 2012 WL 117612 (6th Cir. Jan. 17, 2012) has settled the issue of whether FMLA interference claims should be evaluated under the McDonnell Douglas framework in the Sixth Circuit.  The Donald court held that the McDonnell Douglas test applies.

Under the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, an employee must first establish a prima facie case of discrimination or retaliation.  If the employee succeeds, the burden of production shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the action taken against the employee.  Upon this showing, the burden shifts back to the employee to prove that the employer's proffered reason was pretextual.  Prior to deciding Donald, the Sixth Circuit already applied McDonnell Douglas to FMLA claims involving indirect evidence of retaliation.  However, it was not clear whether McDonnell Douglas similarly applied to interference claims.

In the past, courts in other circuits had argued that employer motive plays no role in a claim for substantive denial of FMLA benefits.  While the Sixth Circuit had not addressed this issue, at least one district court in this circuit agreed.  In settling the issue and holding that McDonnell Douglas is appropriate, the Donald court considered its prior holding in Grace v. USCAR, where it stated that, in an FMLA interference claim, an employer may prove it had a legitimate reason unrelated to the exercise of FMLA rights for terminating an employee.

Email Disclaimer

NOTICE: The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.
Cancel Accept