Quick Results
Case Studies

Unanimous Jury Defense Verdict for Ford in Product Liability Trial

Product Liability Litigation / 2017
Share

Client: Ford Motor Company
Opponent: Nathaniel Wallace
Type of case: Product liability
Court: Federal District Court, Southern District of Mississippi
Length of trial: Six days
Amount in dispute: Approximately $2.5 million
Result: Defense verdict for Ford Motor Company

We defended Ford Motor Company in a federal jury trial in Mississippi against allegations of a manufacturing defect. A Mississippi Highway Patrol trooper was injured when his state-issued 2008 Ford Crown Victoria left the roadway and hit a tree at approximately 55 miles per hour. The trooper alleged that a fractured ball-joint bolt caused him to lose control of the vehicle and hit the tree, and that fractured bolt itself was the result of a manufacturing defect. He demanded approximately $2.5 million. A fact witness for the trooper testified that the broken bolt was found 200 feet upstream of the tree impact.

On behalf of Ford, we contended that the ball-joint bolt broke because of the high speed impact with the tree, and that the vehicle can actually be steered properly even without the bolt. Ford's expert metallurgist further testified that the tests he conducted on the broken bolt proved that the fracture was due to the impact to the tree, and was not a manufacturing defect. The jury agreed with Ford and returned a unanimous defense verdict.

Value to Client: Active annual cases in Mississippi reduced from 60 to 12 with Baker Donelson resulting in $25 million legal fee savings and 90 percent reduction in annual legal spend.

Email Disclaimer

NOTICE: The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.
Cancel Accept