Email This Page  Print This Page Print PDF
Spotlight on Tennessee: Settlement Opportunity for Previously Deducted Intangible Expenses
December 8, 2011

Since 2004, Tennessee franchise and excise taxpayers have been required to disclose "intangible expenses" paid to affiliated entities on Schedule J of their annual Franchise, Excise Tax Return. By disclosing these intangible expenses, a taxpayer was able to deduct the intangible expenses on the Return, but such expenses were denied as deductions if not so disclosed. Also, the taxpayer could be subjected to significant penalties if not so disclosed.

The Tennessee Department of Revenue has regularly reviewed these disclosure forms and in late 2009 began to issue assessments to taxpayers disallowing their intangible expense deductions, even though the expenses were disclosed. The Department claimed authority to do so under the Tennessee variance (or alternative apportionment) statute based on the Department's assertions that the underlying transactions and arrangements giving rise to the intangible expenses lacked business purpose and/or economic substance.

The Department has now issued Notice 11-17, dated November 2011, offering a settlement and compromise opportunity for taxpayers (a) who received assessments disallowing their disclosed intangible expense deductions, and (b) those who did not disclose but are concerned about potential disallowance. The Department will agree to consider requests to compromise and settle these issues for any open tax years ending on or before June 30, 2012. Under such a compromise and settlement request which is approved by the Department, a specific percentage of the intangible expenses will be disallowed and an assessment of tax and interest will be imposed for such disallowed expenses, while the remainder will be allowed as a deduction. The Department has indicated that a penalty would not be applied.

To be eligible, a taxpayer must request to be included in the global compromise initiative by December 31, 2011. Those submitting such requests after December 31, 2011 may also obtain settlement with the Department, but the Notice seems to indicate that the Department will evaluate more closely whether the same terms offered before January 1, 2012 should still apply.

If you would like to discuss the particular terms of this settlement initiative, how it may affect your company based on your facts and circumstances, or help you evaluate participating, please contact one of the following attorneys in the Firm's Tax Department:

Washington, D.C.
Scott D. Smith 202.508.3430
James W. McBride 202.508.3467
  
Nashville, Tennessee
Carolyn W. Schott 615.726.7312
John B. Burns 615.726.5599
Daniel A. Stephenson 615.726.5678

Memphis, Tennessee
William H.D. Fones 901.577.2247
Mary Ann Jackson 901.577.8113
Charles E. Pierce 901.577.2164

East Memphis, Tennessee
James "Josh" Hall 901.579.3126
Christopher J. Coats 901.579.3127

Chattanooga, Tennessee
Carl E. Hartley 423.756.2010
Virginia C. Love 423.209.4118
Sara E. McManus 423.209.4124
Philip B. Whitaker 423.209.4182

Knoxville, Tennessee
L. Eric Ebbert 865.971.5182

Atlanta, Georgia
Nedom A. Haley 404.221.6505
Michael M. Smith 404.589.3419
Michael S. Evans 404.221.6517

New Orleans, Louisiana
Robert W. Nuzum 504.566.5209
Robert L. Wollfarth 504.566.8623

Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Alton "Biff" Bayard 225.381.7019

Jackson, Mississippi
Stacy E. Thomas 601.351.2484
Jon D. Seawright 601.351.8921
David P. Webb 601.969.4678

Birmingham, Alabama
Thomas J. Mahoney, Jr. 205.250.8346
William R. Sylvester 205.250.8372
Adam S. Winger 205.250.8381